What do you think if QBFC will generate .NET executables?
Your question caught me by surprise.
Do it really have to be in .net format?
I remember theres a freeware .net compiler in softpedia. Its a batch compiler using .net but never get to run, so deleted it and I also forgot its name. It uses .net to cojmpile but I cant remember whether the compiled exe is in .net or not since I never manage to start the program at all.
.NET is a Microsoft platform. It use standard EXE files, but they will require a .NET framework installed on user PC.
We are working on our own bytecode compiler, but thinking about use something standard - like Java or .NET virtual machines.
We can translate batch script to any language - Pascal, C, PHP and compile it with .net compiler to real executable.
It's not a same way as freware .net compiler from softpedia.
Many years ago we were asked the question - what makes our product better than others. Now we can say unambiguously that QBFC is the only real bat to exe compiler. No competitor has ever been able to do without creating temporary files.