Convert your BATch files into EXEcutable format in one click.
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:40 pm
We have no public demos.
What do you think if QBFC will generate .NET executables?
Whale
Posts: 22 Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:56 pm
Post
by Whale » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:55 pm
support wrote: We have no public demos.
What do you think if QBFC will generate .NET executables?
Your question caught me by surprise.
Do it really have to be in .net format?
I remember theres a freeware .net compiler in softpedia. Its a batch compiler using .net but never get to run, so deleted it and I also forgot its name. It uses .net to cojmpile but I cant remember whether the compiled exe is in .net or not since I never manage to start the program at all.
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:41 pm
.NET is a Microsoft platform. It use standard EXE files, but they will require a .NET framework installed on user PC.
We are working on our own bytecode compiler, but thinking about use something standard - like Java or .NET virtual machines.
We can translate batch script to any language - Pascal, C, PHP and compile it with .net compiler to real executable.
It's not a same way as freware .net compiler from softpedia.
Whale
Posts: 22 Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:56 pm
Post
by Whale » Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:43 pm
Can it not be .net dependent?
If its possible not to made it a .net dependent, it would be great.
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:23 am
Our virtual machine doesn't have .net dependency.
Whale
Posts: 22 Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:56 pm
Post
by Whale » Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:34 pm
support wrote: Our virtual machine doesn't have .net dependency.
Good.
So when all of us see even a release date?
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:19 am
I think we will release new version until new year.
Whale
Posts: 22 Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:56 pm
Post
by Whale » Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:41 pm
support wrote: I think we will release new version until new year.
Now is 2014, an update regarding it would nice.
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:55 pm
Whale wrote:
Now is 2014, an update regarding it would nice.
Users' interest in the compiler has fallen dramatically. Most peoples migrated to the Powershell.
Whale
Posts: 22 Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:56 pm
Post
by Whale » Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:31 pm
support wrote:
Users' interest in the compiler has fallen dramatically. Most peoples migrated to the Powershell.
Well, I still use batch file daily, batch file havent reach its expire day yet, and alot of people I know still use it daily too.
So how's the development getting on?
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:25 am
Whale wrote:
So how's the development getting on?
Virtual machine supports most commands except FOR/IF statements.
Whale
Posts: 22 Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:56 pm
Post
by Whale » Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:14 pm
support wrote:
Virtual machine supports most commands except FOR/IF statements.
So will I be seeing a beta this year?
support
Site Admin
Posts: 425 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:05 pm
Post
by support » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:35 am
I don't know. All developers focused on the another project.