What makes Quick Batch File Compiler better than the others?

Post by **support** » Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:40 pm

We have no public demos.

What do you think if QBFC will generate .NET executables?

Whale · Post by **Whale** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:55 pm

support wrote:We have no public demos.

What do you think if QBFC will generate .NET executables?

Your question caught me by surprise.

Do it really have to be in .net format?

I remember theres a freeware .net compiler in softpedia. Its a batch compiler using .net but never get to run, so deleted it and I also forgot its name. It uses .net to cojmpile but I cant remember whether the compiled exe is in .net or not since I never manage to start the program at all.

Post by **support** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:41 pm

.NET is a Microsoft platform. It use standard EXE files, but they will require a .NET framework installed on user PC.

We are working on our own bytecode compiler, but thinking about use something standard - like Java or .NET virtual machines.
We can translate batch script to any language - Pascal, C, PHP and compile it with .net compiler to real executable.

It's not a same way as freware .net compiler from softpedia.

Whale · Post by **Whale** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:43 pm

Can it not be .net dependent?

If its possible not to made it a .net dependent, it would be great.

Post by **support** » Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:23 am

Our virtual machine doesn't have .net dependency.

Whale · Post by **Whale** » Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:34 pm

support wrote:Our virtual machine doesn't have .net dependency.

Good.

So when all of us see even a release date?

Post by **support** » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:19 am

I think we will release new version until new year.

Whale · Post by **Whale** » Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:41 pm

support wrote:I think we will release new version until new year.

Now is 2014, an update regarding it would nice.

Post by **support** » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:55 pm

Whale wrote: Now is 2014, an update regarding it would nice.

Users' interest in the compiler has fallen dramatically. Most peoples migrated to the Powershell.

Whale · Post by **Whale** » Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:31 pm

support wrote: Users' interest in the compiler has fallen dramatically. Most peoples migrated to the Powershell.

Well, I still use batch file daily, batch file havent reach its expire day yet, and alot of people I know still use it daily too.

So how's the development getting on?

Post by **support** » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:25 am

Whale wrote: So how's the development getting on?

Virtual machine supports most commands except FOR/IF statements.

Whale · Post by **Whale** » Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:14 pm

support wrote: Virtual machine supports most commands except FOR/IF statements.

So will I be seeing a beta this year?

Post by **support** » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:35 am

I don't know. All developers focused on the another project.